Berschler & Draluck
Maritime Attorneys
A shipowner makes a contractual promise to employees working aboard the ship to provide a vessel and its appurtenances that are reasonably safe for intended use. This promise is called the warranty of seaworthiness. The shipowner is liable for injuries resulting from a breach. The Osceola, 189 U.S. 158 (1903). Mitchell v. Trawler, Racer, Inc., 362 U.S. 539 (1960).
Unseaworthiness does not require fault. It may include temporary conditions like fish slime on the deck; defective equipment or appurtenances; misuse of otherwise adequate equipment; incompetent crew; or failure to provide certain equipment or sufficient manning of crew.
Similar to negligence under the Jones Act, a violation of a safety statute may also support a finding of unseaworthiness.
See Odom, LexisNexis Practice Guide: Wash. Torts and Personal Injury, Chapter 11. (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.).
The Who, What, When, and Why
Please briefly state your case facts. Be sure to include the date the incident happened.
BERSCHLER & DRALUCK
Maritime Attorneys
720 Seneca St Suite 107-2
Seattle, WA 98101
DISCLAIMER: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information provided, it is not intended and should not be considered as legal advice. Individual situations differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. Please contact our office if you seek more specific technical or legal advice on the information provided or related topics. Thank you.